President Donald Trump weighs in on SCOTUS birthright citizenship case

president Donald Trump weighs the case of citizenship that was held before the Supreme Court on Thursday, and insisted that the law was originally aimed at benefiting from the descendants of slaves, not illegal immigrants.

“It was not intended from the relevant citizenship for people who take the holidays to become permanent citizens in the United States of America, and bring their families with them, every time they laugh at the” heep “that we are!” Trump wrote in a publication Thursday morning on his social platform for the truth, where the arguments were heard. “The United States of America is the only country in the world to do this, for any reason, no one knows – but drug cartridges love it!”

Trump added that the newly born citizenship, which was adopted as a constitutional amendment in 1868, was aimed primarily to benefit from the children of slaves.

The Supreme Court takes over the newly born citizen

“He has nothing to do with illegal immigration to people who want to defraud our country, from all over the world, which they have done for many years,” Trump said in office. “It was about the results of the civil war, and the children of slaves whose politicians felt properly needed to protect. Please clarify this to the United States Supreme Court.”

Trump cited the issue of a path with a path that is “another point that leads to a dysfunction in America.”

“We, in order to be politically correct, a stupid country, but in reality, this is the exact opposite because it is political correct, another point that leads to the job defect of America.”

“Every court ruled against you”: Supreme Court judge, Elena Kagan, is exacerbated with American lawyer John Saur in the case of citizenship in the field of birth.

On May 15, 2025, President Donald Trump claimed that the law was aiming to protect the descendants of slaves, not illegal immigrants. (Associated Press/Istock)

While the issue that is heard on Thursday resulted from conflicts against the president’s efforts to end the newly born citizenship, which is the right for any child born in the United States to automatically obtain citizenship, the issue of whether it is permissible to permanently prevent Trump’s executive actions.

Through comprehensive orders, low federal courts can prevent the authorities from enforcing Trump’s executive.

Click for the Fox News app

The issue of citizenship was put in the field of births after Trump signed on the first day, which is an executive matter, aimed at entering into force on February 19, which re -explains the amendment of the nineteenth century. But shortly after the signing of the matter, the legal challenges followed and the Federal judges appointed by Democrats began prohibiting the president’s procedure.

Meanwhile, the appeal of these decisions from the Trump administration failed before the Supreme Court decided to take the case.

It is not clear when the final ruling for the Supreme Court judges will be issued in the case of citizenship in the field of newborns. It may take weeks, or it may take only several hours if they decide to issue an emergency ruling immediately.