Roberts reaffirms judicial independence as Supreme Court takes up Trump cases

The President of the Supreme Court John Roberts used a public appearance on Wednesday to emphasize the importance of the independent judiciary, which doubles the defense of the courts that President Donald Trump and his allies, who accused the so -called “active judges”, were subjected to bypassing their borders.

When asked during a chat event on the Fireside side in Boufalo, New York, about judicial independence, Roberts replied in any unconfirmed conditions that the role of federal courts is “determining cases, but during that, it verifies the excesses of congress or the executive authority.”

He added that “this role requires a degree of independence.”

Boasberg roams the Ministry of Justice on notes from Trump and Nayyem, and the migrants are used to Gitmo at hearing

Roberts’ notes are not new. But they came at a time when Trump and his allies against federal judges who temporarily stopped or stopped major parts of the president’s agenda. (Some of the rulings they took from the judges came from the judges who were appointed by Trump during his first term.)

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a number of prominent cases and emergency emergency presented by the Trump administration in the next few months, which are certainly cases that will keep the Supreme Court in the spotlight in the foreseeable future.

Among them is Trump’s executive orders that prevent sexual service members from service from service in the US military, restoring federal employees who opened fire to their jobs and a case about whether the children whose parents entered illegally in the United States and born here is nationality should be granted. Oral arguments for this last case begin next week.

Trump’s alignment group sue John Roberts, in an attempt to restrict court authority

Judge John Roberts, the right, speaks with the American boycott judge, Lawrence J. Villardo during a conversation in Boufalo, New York (AP Photo/Jeffrey T. Barnes)

A few hours before speaking to Roberts with the American boycott judge, Lawrence Villardo, a high -risk hearing was a federal court in Washington, DC.

There, the American boycott judge James Boasberg spent more than an hour in the grill of the Ministry of Justice about their use of the law of Foreign Enemies to deport hundreds of immigrants to El Salvador earlier this year.

On March 15, Boasberg ordered that Trump’s temporary use of the law to send immigrants to Salvadori prison sparked anger from the White House and in Congress, as some Trump’s allies had previously made invitations.

Judge John Roberts President John Speaks during a conversation on the fire side in the celebration of the fifteenth anniversary of the local United States Court of the Western Region in New York on Wednesday, May 7, 2025, in Boufalo, New York (AP Photo/Jeffrey T. Barnes)

Roberts, who issued a rare public statement at the time to reprimand calls to establish Boasberg or any federal judges, doubled on Wednesday’s notes.

“The dismissal is not how to register the dispute with a decision,” Roberts said, adding that he had already spoken of this in his previous statement.

Click here to get the Fox News app

In the statement, which Roberts sent shortly after Trump put forward the idea of ​​isolating boasberg, he said, “For more than two centuries, it has been proven that the dismissal is not an appropriate response to the dispute regarding a judicial decision.”

“There is a regular appeal review process for this purpose,” he said in the statement.