Apple sues leaker Jon Prosser for allegedly stealing iOS 26 info from an employee

Apple is sued the leakage John Bruce and Codefndant to evacuate the secrets of trade related to earlier this year and depicting the absorption (which was, at that time,). In the lawsuit, which Apple filed in a local court in the northern province of California, the company claims that PRROSSER and Michael Ramacciotti “conspired to storm iPhone to develop an Apple employee to take the Apple trading Secrets.”

For each, which was obtained before Bruced promised to “discover a method for [Ramacciotti] To get the payment “If Codefendant is able to access the IPHONE development of his friend Ethan Lipnik, who worked on Apple software designs. Apple claims that Ramacciotti was staying with Lipnik and waited until he left for a long time, using a site tracking tool.

It is claimed that Prosser used the screen capture tool to record the video call and then share the footage with others to create model models that he used in its videos (PROSSER said that Apple uses identifiers in development versions of its programs to help them identify leaks, and re -create offers, aims to protect them). One of those people who saw the footage is said to have confessed to the Lipnik apartment and informed him of that.

In January, Bruce Ali Technology the first page YouTube channel, which depicts an offer to redesign the iOS 26 camera, which seemed relatively close to the real deal. She later showed her assimilation of Apple design.

Apple has completed Lipnik’s work for its failure to protect confidential information. In the lawsuit, Lipnik said that Ramacciotti “often spent time in his home, sometimes residing at the weekend, and monitoring his patterns and security protocols for his devices.” Apple says she has discovered the alleged theft of trade by an unknown and that she also has a sound note sent by ramaciotti to Lipnik to apologize and claim that Prosser was behind the scheme.

The company claims that the development of the concerned iPhone hosted “a large amount of Apple Trade Secret information that has not yet been publicly disclosed. He added that he does not know how much this information was obtained.

Apple seeks a judicial order that directs Prosser and Ramacciotti “not to benefit from or detects the secret, ownership and commercial information of Apple to third parties without its written consent” and to destroy any of these materials that he possesses. The company also seeks to obtain compensation and requires the trial of the jury.

Bruced responded to the case on X, claiming that “this is not the way things fell at my end. I look forward to the ability to speak to Apple on this topic.” Prosser continued by saying, “As for the record: Certainly, I did not” conspiracy “to reach anyone’s phone and I was not aware of the situation.”

If you buy something through a link in this article, we may win the commission.