Scientists Teach AI to Think About the Roman Empire

Historians do not know when the old Roman text is written by the old Roman text, which is the old Roman text, for the first time, because this type of drawing tends to not contain any written dates.

Enter our hero Aeneas – not the legendary pieces of Rome, but the AI Trained model that was trained in ancient Roman texts. according to The New York Times, AENEAS AI has set the history of Augustus Epigraph to about 15 m, shortly after his death in 14 m.

AENEAAS, developed by Google Deepmind, was able to do this because it mimics what historians do but faster: recovering related contextual information, detecting isolated texts, and analyzing them before reaching the summary.

In a new paper in the magazine of science natureGoogle Deepmind researchers and many European universities have developed an artificial intelligence model through his steps and found that he was able to provide useful information for historians in most cases, which enhances its clear benefit.

For history seekers, AENEAAS is just a group of growing AI tools that help them to detect more details around the ancient world.

“Modern obstetric models now help to convert the box [study of ancient script] Alison Cole, a professor of ancient history, from the University of Warwick, said in a statement on research, from specialized discipline to a sophisticated field of historical investigation, “said the professor of classic and classic classic study, from the University of Warwick, in a statement on the research.

To study any kind of old writing, historians must integrate through various archives all over the world while seeking “similarities” – ancient texts of similar formulation or from the same time in time – and compare them to the text they are studying. Using this method, researchers can extrapolate what lost fragments may say or context.

“The study of history through the inscriptions is similar to the solution of a giant panorama.” Newton.

But this process is long and boring, and it requires historians to undergo years of specialized training.

In their evaluation of AENEAS, the authors of the study found that the tool was able to provide “useful starting points in 90 percent of cases, which improves their confidence in the main tasks of 44 percent,” says the paper. Moreover, when human historians and the artificial intelligence model worked alongside, the results were better compared to Aneas or historians working alone without any help.

But what about Aneas Halucingent Reports, what is a continuous problem with many artificial intelligence models? The model gives possibilities for its predictions.

“It is interesting that Einsus surrounded her bets,” said Cole, who accurately praised the model. “When doing this, this completely reflects the current difference in the opinions of scientists, which gives potential historical ranges instead of one prediction.”

This epic strengthens the idea that artificial intelligence can be useful for the subject experts who know what to do. (This is unlike when non -experts use artificial intelligence, when it seems that strange and annoying objects sometimes happen constantly.)

If users of this program are using this tool effectively – they seem to be able – anyone in ancient history should be very excited; We can soon learn more about our past.

More about artificial intelligence: Scientists infiltrate clips into research papers designed to deceive artificial intelligence auditors