SCOTUS justice has wild exchange with lawyer over children’s LGBTQ storybook

0 3 minutes read

1745461301 SCOTUS justice has wild exchange with lawyer over childrens LGBTQ.png

The lawyer for the Maryland County School and the US Supreme Court judge, Neil Jorm, has made a brutal exchange this week about a book for children amid an ongoing case presented by parents who want to be able to get their children to read LGBTQ stories in their general school.

Goroush was asking Alan Shunfield, a lawyer who represents Montgomery County Schools, about “PRIDPY!” A 32 -page book tells the story of a family that celebrates the Day of Pride when their dog is lost in the show and the efforts made to collect the puppy with its loved ones.

Alphabet Rhyming, which was described as “confirming and comprehensive” by his publisher, allows the readers to discover the elements that start with each of the alphabet messages while providing a “happy glimpse of the Predic procession and the vibrant society that this day celebrates every year.”

The book was previously used in the boycott curriculum before kindergarten.

It seems that the Supreme Court stands with parents in the religious freedom dispute over story books

The United States Supreme Court judge Nil Gorsh had several questions about “Pride Persons!” Children’s book during Tuesday’s session. (supreme court)

“It is used to teach English at the age of 3?” Brush request.

“Pride puppy!” The book that was used in the pre -kindergarten curriculum was.

“This is the person who is supposed to search for leather and things – and slavery – things like that,” he replied.

“She is not slavery. She is a woman in skin …”

“Sex factor?” He asked Gorsh.

“No. This is not true. No,” Shunfield replied.

Parents tell Scotos: He wrote LGBTQ stories in the classroom with our faith

A primary school teacher was seen reading a book about sex for students. (Getty Images)

“Oh my God, I read it … withdraw the queen?” Gorsh said.

Schovield said that the skin is actually a woman in a leather jacket and that “one of the words is the queen of clouds.”

The Supreme Court heard arguments in the case presented by religious parents who say that young children cannot expect the teacher’s moral messages to be separated from the beliefs of their families.

Eric Paxter, a lawyer who represents parents in Maryland in Mahmoud v. TaEuer told the judges that the educational zone violated the first amendment by rejecting requests to cancel the participation in books that “contradict their religious beliefs”, even with allowing exemptions for other religious objections-such as books that depict the Muslim Prophet Muhammad.

Follow -up of the case: A new resistance fights the second Trump period by attacking the lawsuits that aim to EOS

The US Supreme Court judge Nil Gorsh had questions about the book “PRIDE PUPPY”. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

Paxter said that teachers should use materials in the classroom after the boycott agreed to some of the curriculum books titled LGBTQ in 2022.

“When books were first presented in August 2022, the Board of Directors suggested using them five times before the end of the year,” he said. “One of the schools, Sherwood School, said, in June for the month of Barid, that they would read one book every day.”

The boycott initially allowed parents to cancel their children due to religious concerns, but they reflected the path by March 2023, noting concerns about absence and administrative burdens.

Praid’s stories were written in the curriculum of the Monteghensi Province. (Picky)

Among the other stories books in the middle of the case “Prince & Knight”, a recent fairy tale targeting children between the ages of 4 and 8, which tells the story of two men who fall in love after joining a dragon defeat and married later.

Another book was referred to frequently during the oral arguments is the “Uncle Bobby’s wedding”, which follows a little girl who addresses her uncle’s favorite decision to marry another man.