Supreme Court poised to make major decision impacting President Trump agenda

The Supreme Court agreed to study the Trump administration’s challenge for judges who are issuing judicial orders at the country, setting an appointment for a case that could have a major impact on the president’s ability to implement his agenda as well as in the entire country.

This comes after three federal judges issued separate orders worldwide, with a executive order by President Donald Trump, who ends the citizenship of illegal immigrant children.

On Thursday, the court strengthened the three cases in one oral argument to study the basic question about whether the provincial judges can issue rulings affecting the entire country.

The court will hear oral arguments for the case at 10 am on May 15, which is about two weeks away from the court usually stopped hearing oral arguments before a holiday, which begins in July.

The Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in the case of citizenship with rights

The restraint orders at the country are the orders of the court that prevents the federal government from implementing a policy or law that has a successive impact that affects the entire country, and not only the parties participating in the court case.

Since Trump returned to the Oval Office in January, his administration has faced hundreds of lawsuits targeting his executive orders and actions, some of which led to judicial orders at the country level, which led to the stopping of the main parts of his agenda, including the application of immigration.

Nearly two states that Trump suggests the supervisor of citizenship generator: “unprecedented”

The United States Supreme Court in Washington, DC, will see on March 26, 2024.

In March, the Trump administration submitted an emergency appeal requesting the Supreme Court to narrow three judicial orders that were issued to cancel Trump to the newborn. The emergency resumption request that only the immoral order will cover individuals who are directly affected by the relevant courts.

Click here to get the Fox News app

The Attorney General for representation in the administration, Sarah Harris, argued in the resumption of emergency that restraining orders at the country have set “the dimensions of the epidemic” under the second Trump administration, noting that the federal government faced 14 global orders in the first three years of the Biden administration compared to 15 followers against the Trump official in one month alone.

In addition to influencing the issue of continuous citizenship for the children of illegal immigrants, the court’s final decision is likely to have the greatest impact of the answer recently on the borders of the authority of federal rulers to determine the questions of national and international policy.

Emma Colon of Fox News Digitter and Brin Depsh contributed to this report.