Supreme Court to hear oral arguments in birthright citizenship case

The Supreme Court will listen to oral arguments next month in the case that challenges President Donald Trump’s attempt to end the newly born citizenship, while it is likely to be one of the most expected cases that are being reviewed by the Supreme Court since Trump took office.

The judges said on Thursday that they would hear arguments about unified cases on May 15, about four weeks from now.

In March, the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to intervene and allow a narrow copy of the presidential executive order that ends the citizenship born to move forward. Trump signed the matter on his first day in his position and immediately met him a set of lawsuits throughout the country.

The administration’s appeal is related to three judicial orders in the country brought in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington.

The official appeals to Trump, the ruling that prevents citizenship

The three states have issued all orders in the country that prevent the ban of the generated citizen Submit the Supreme Court It was very wide.

The US Attorney General Sarah Harris asked the judges to limit the scope of rulings to cover only individuals who were directly affected by the relevant courts.

Harris wrote in their appeal: “These cases – which involve challenges on the presidential executive order on January 20, 2025 regarding the newborn citizenship – raises important constitutional questions with great repercussions to secure the borders.”

To date, no court has stood alongside the executive order of the Trump administration that seeks to ban the newly born citizenship, although many provinces courts prevented her from secret.

The ninth circle refuses Trump’s attempt to restore the birth of the generator

congress" width="1200" height="675"/>

The Supreme Court judges are attending the state of the Union State by President Joe Biden in the Capitol in Washington, DC, on March 7, 2024. (Shawn Thew-Pool/Getty Images)

Trump’s executive order was initially determined on February 19. Politics affected hundreds of thousands of children born in the United States every year.

It sought to re -explain the fourteenth amendment, which states: “All the people born or manived in the United States, and are subject to the jurisdiction, are citizens of the United States and the country where they reside.”

According to the proposed interpretation of the Trump Administration-which was later banned by federal courts-children born to illegal immigrants or those who were legally here but on temporary immigrant visas, they are not citizens of children’s rights.

More than 22 American states and immigrant rights groups sued the Trump administration soon to prevent change in the newly born citizenship, arguing in the court files that the executive order is unconstitutional and “unprecedented”.

Click for the Fox News app

The states have also argued that the fourteenth amendment, in fact, guarantees citizenship for people born on American soil and naturalized in the United States

The United States is one of about 30 countries where Co -citizenship It applies.