The Harry Potter TV Series Must Rectify These JK Rowling Mistakes

If you do not hear, “Harry Potter” TV comes to HBO and the controversial creator JK Rowling. Rowling Anti-Trans comments have given a shadow on the size of dementia on the next project, which is one of the main reasons why the series is able to flounder. However, the polarized personal situations of the author are not the only thing that can be successful in the display, as it is known that they make unwanted creative changes on the traditions of “Harry Potter” over the years.

Since the adventures of the literary boy therapist ended, Rolling has played many elements of stories – usually on social media – and killed some magic. The author’s additions after publishing to Lore World Comply include everything from changes to character stations to disclosure of prediction … and let’s only say that the updates have not been praised globally. If Rolling insists on implementing these ideas in the HBO series, it may prove more destroyed than Voldemort’s curse of “Avada Kedavra” on the victim of insult, and the planned range can be cut for 10 years.

On the other hand, the TV series is an opportunity for Rowling to fix some of these mistakes and restore magic that made “Harry Potter” attractive to millions of people in the first place. With this in mind, let’s take a look at some of the worst examples of the author re -blogging and assume how HBO can eliminate things.

It can be said that JK Rowling is a reaction to the obsession of eternal fans with all things “Harry Potter”. People want to learn more about the world of magicians, and although indescribable trivia is interesting, some post -publication detection of the author comes as enforced and unclean. For example, did we really need to know that Magic Folk had used their capabilities to get rid of their tube before embracing the Muggle toilet systems? Maybe not, but this is not even the most unwanted information – or confusing – of the information that Rowling shared.

Let’s talk about the decision to make Al -Najini a human being of Asian origin before becoming a pet snake in Volddort. “Great monsters: Grindelwald crimes” – which was set 70 years before the main “Harry Potter” narration – explores this topic, put Rowling at work on social media to justify him, and revealed that the character is Maledictus, anyone who was cursed to turn into a creature. There is nothing wrong with its nature in giving Nagini background nagini, but the fact that he did not hint to “Harry Potter” books that make it extra. Not only that, but Nagini has been criticized as a shallow attempt to force diversity on a privilege that lacks – and it is not the only example of this issue specified in play.

Rolling claimed that the Hermium race was not explicitly mentioned in the books, although passing through “Harry Potter and a Zakaban Prisoner” describing her face specifically white-and Emma Watson’s photography now famous for the character has strengthened this idea. The author also made a big deal of Dumbldor being gay, which was never brought up in books. Acting is a good thing, but its emphasis on X (previously known as Twitter) years later – instead of transferring it on the page – makes it meaningless and confusing. (The movie “Wonderful Monsters” did not do a lot with this idea too.) So, how can the next show understand these changes?

JK Rowling attempts to retreat “Harry Potter” did not fell the way it was contemplating. There is an argument that must be presented that its updates are a reaction to Vandum’s refusal to allow the story to end, but the author’s disclosure is not consistent with the novel of the original stories. Fortunately for her, the HBO series is an opportunity to combine some of these ideas useful in a convincing narration (with non -feasible burial).

Arabella Stanton’s filming in Hermion’s role in Harry Potter’s adaptation of HBO is proven that creators adopt some Rolling changes. By placing a mixed young man in this role, Hermion can now be created as a colored person – as Rolling is supposed to aim to be – and clarify any continuous doubts about her identity. Elsewhere, the show needs either legitimacy to the idea that Nagini was previously human or better. A negative reaction to rewriting the character indicates that fans preferred it to be just a snake, unlike an Asian woman who has become a pet that treats sweat. But if it should be intelligent, the HBO series must treat it in a convincing and justified manner.

Most of the Rolling stations that were re -equipped are unnecessary, but others prove the lack of attention to detail. Take, for example, the appearance of Professor McGonagall (Fiona Glascott) in the “wonderful monsters” privilege, where they are shown on teaching in Hogwarts in the twenties and thirties. However, the Pottermore-on which Rolling depends-reveals that the character was born in 1935, how can she be adults during the “wonderful monsters” schedule? However, Rolling is known to update the professor’s background from time to time, some deserve to be explored in the HBO series.

Let’s face it: Mineva Mcgonagall flourished when we didn’t know much about it. Imagine the original “Harry Potter” books-and its subsequent air conditioner in films-as she is a strong and meaningless professor who is simply respected by being herself. “Harry Potter and Phoenix”, which occurs in the mid -1990s, also reveals that it is taught in Hugors for 39 years at that stage, which contradicts the “wonderful monsters” mentioned above. The next TV series should adhere to the original plan, but it can also implement some of the original additions to Rowling to the traditions of Mcgonagall to remove the smell of its confusing manifestations in Prequel movies.

Before the “wonderful monsters” that rewrites McGonagall, Rowling formulated a media biography on the Pottermore where the future president of Gryfindor was participating in the MugGle farms, but in the end he chose a life of magic at the expense of romance. It is a tragic story in some respects, but McGonagall’s decision has also strengthened its agency and ambition, which makes it more impressive. She later found the love of a member of the Ministry of Magic – only to die after being bitten by toxins. Did we need to know this? Not really, but it is very interesting.

The HBO series does not have to dive into the original McGonagall history in great detail, but the reference to it must be sufficient to reject the confusing chaos that is its background in “Bantastic Beasts”, with the addition of more depths to a mysterious personality otherwise. At least, you will return some consistency to the schedule in the world of magicians – and end the fans’ discussions about McGonagall using Time Turner for teaching in Hogwarts before birth. Rolling has already amended the professor’s biography to reflect its manifestations in “wonderful monsters”, although the books contradict them, so it may have come time to return to the original idea and leave it in that.

HBO Harry Potter is scheduled to be shown on the first show on HBO and HBO Max in 2027.