The Original Stepford Wives Movie Spawned A Forgotten Horror Franchise

Brian Forbes of 1975 “The Stepford Wives” is a warning story for the ages. There is a camp for the film that only sharpens the satirical edge, but when it tends to huge suspension, the heirs are original. The Era Levin’s novel, “The Wives of Sitford”, got the cultural miles that are consistent with contracts, which inspires the most modern excitement such as “Do not worry my love” (which mainly repeats the assumption of origin without success or condemnation).

Although Forbes’s story is more layer than in the beginning, the basic criticism lies in the systematic subjugation of women through parental practices, as it is reduced to improved for men who marry. This is taken to stimulate the inconvenience of extremism in the Forbes movie, and when Joanna Ehtharret (Catherine Ross) moves to Standard with her husband, we imagine the strange social behavior of society through skeptical eyes. Joanna immediately notes that women in society are obsessed with being homes ideal for pictures, while men are more than happy to do the minimum and enjoy the clarification of their wives.

The psychological horror of the film is eventually increasing, leading to a somewhat dark end. Although the story is not close to perfection, it links the policy of commercial identity to spinning elegance in some interesting ways. Although FORBES is culturally as it is the case, it is a less reputation that “Stepford” produced three titles (!) Associated with them, which constitutes a horror privilege that is still overwhelmed by the original.

The first direct supplement is “The Revenge of the Stepford Wives” in the 1980s, a horror film made for television, which occurs 10 years after the events of the original movie. This small story is looking at the consequences of couples who want to leave Stepford, prompting Kaye Foster (Sharon GLESS) to see the ideal community apparently to investigate. The immediate signs that something more ominous is more explicit here, as Kay notes women who show birth control pills several times a day after the sirens are shined through the city’s loudspeakers. As the plot advanced, Kay was founded on herself as a sharp hero and a trick dedicated to the liberation of women trapped in Stepord, even after she learns the heinous truth. This is one of the best entries in the concession, although a mysterious attack does not explore the central cup for revenge.

Next, we have “The Stepford Children” of 1986, where a couple moves to Stepford with their children, David (Randall Batinkoff) and Mary (Tammy Lauren). It seems that David’s father and Mary, Stephen (Don Murray), have been bothered by their bitter and bitter lives and joined the Men’s Signal Association to accommodate them in obedient and transmitted robots with a little feeling. Children, although he is unaware of this, feel panic because of the positions of adults around them, who seem to be obsessed with monitoring their children to help them achieve a “ideal” social image. Now, this is a decent follow -up to “revenge”, but it lacks the ingenuity of its ancestors, as well as condemnation of a story that remains committed to issues of abuse of parents and their repercussions.

You might have already felt a topic here, so it should not be surprising that the final input in this series “The Stepford Beaviss” (which opens with a man who kills his wife violently before suicide). The story tries to turn the original concept on its head by introducing men in Stepford that acquires their wives, with the Stepford of Human Behavior Reserves responsible for this transformation. Regardless of amazing writing and inspiring offers, this inverted concept in “The Stepford Beaviss” is flat due to the strict lack of real life, so that the strongest brand of bad cannot be compared to the terrifying consequences of a denying violent women who affect everyone In society. This is the shallow symptom of a familiar and more creative hypothesis of the triple.

Although nothing can outperform the raw impact of 1975, this follow -up (with the exception of the third) is appropriate enough for an hour for one time.