The U.S. and EU Are Fighting Over Who Controls Big Tech

President Trump has just slapped 30 % definitions on the goods coming from the European Union, and has long escalated a long -term conflict over those who get large technology rules. The move came after Brussels moved forward with more regulations, and this time it targeted the prosperous artificial intelligence field.

The latest Flash point is the new “Blog of Practice” of the European Union of Amnesty International, a set of voluntary guidelines issued on Thursday aimed at addressing public safety concerns. Although it is not legally linked, the code depends on the European Union’s artificial intelligence law, and companies that do not expect through the intense organizational scrutiny of the risks on August 2. Openai announced its intention to sign the code on Friday, while the Lobby Ccia technology collection, whose members include Google and Meta, criticized the instructions.

The Trump administration was publicly hostile to the European Union’s attempts to organize American technology companies. Trump described the massive fines of the mass as “blackmail abroad”, while Treasury Secretary Scott Payet claimed that she was working as background definitions.

This opinion was amplified by the Silicon Valley. In the January announcement, the CEO of Meta Mark Zuckerberg said that his company “will work with President Trump to respond to governments around the world that follow American companies,” specifically, calling on European organizers. These tensions have paralyzed commercial negotiations. In May, Trump administration officials told the New York Post that the talks had stopped regarding the European Union’s refusal to abandon its millions of dollars against US technology giants.

What are the fines imposed by the European Union?

According to the 2022 Digital Markets Law (DMA), all of whom were considered “gates guards”, which is the Patti Law. Meta fighting results and will not suggest changes, which means more fines on the way.

Will the European Union double a cave or double?

Despite Trump’s pressure, the European Union appears to be intended to maintain its organizational independence. Earlier this month, the head of technology at the European Commission, Hina Virkontin, told Politico that the rules of the bloc related to digital competition and Amnesty International were not ready to negotiate.

However, the European Union showed some preparation for the settlement. The bloc recently dropped a proposed tax on digital companies from its next budget, a step seen as a Trump administration victory.

The question now is whether these new definitions will lead to counterproductive results and raise a tougher campaign. In response to the first round of definitions in April, European Union President Ursula von der Lin was open about targeting large technology with counter -measures if the conversations failed. While the bloc has been delayed by a set of reprisals that were appointed into force last Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron explained that the weapon of the European Union is the most fearful on the table: the anti -behavior tool.

Macron wrote on X.

Besides the President of the European Commission, France shares the same very strong rejection when announcing the horizontal tariffs by 30 % on the European Union’s exports to the United States as of August 1.

This announcement comes after weeks of intense participation by the committee in …

Emmanuelmacron July 12, 2025

The biggest picture

The Bazoka Arch Control Tool in the European Union Arsenal is considered. While the traditional customs tariffs reach material goods, this tool allows the European Union to impose commercial restrictions on services from a country what you see uses economic coercion. If the United States is found to suit the bill, the American technology giants that provide digital services, such as Apple, Google and Meta, can be uniquely weak.

Ultimately, both sides are fighting to protect their interests: the Trump administration wants to defend the American hegemony in the global technology industry, while the European Union wants to organize digital platforms on its own terms. As negotiations continue, not only will decide the fate of the technology companies that have been hunting in the center but will also set the rules of global technology sovereignty for years to come.

But for the large technology companies that were discovered in Crossfire, the message is clear: this is a war on digital sovereignty, and the rules of the next era may be written in Brussels as much as Washington.