Thune pushes Trump’s ‘big beautiful bill’ toward July 4 amid GOP divisions

First on the fox: The majority of the Senate John Thun collects the opposite winds at his own conference on distinguished concerns in the “Grand and Beautiful Bill” of President Donald Trump, who threatens to produce the legislation, but takes it in a step by step and consisting that the huge will reach the President’s office by July 4.

“We have to strike it, and you know if this means that this is the end of next week, or whether we were rolling in this fourth week of July,” Republican at South Dakota told Fox News Digital during an interview from his leadership wing.

“But if we have to go this week, we will rise.” “I think this is important. You know what I saw here, at least in the past, my experience, if there is no deadline, things tend to continue indefinitely.”

Trump’s best ally expects the Senate will blow the “big and beautiful bill” deadline

Republicans in the Senate are working on their copy of the Trump Mammoth Bill, which includes priorities for tax cuts and jobs for 2017, permanent changes, comprehensive changes in health care, energy credits in the Biden era, and deep spending discounts, among other things, since the beginning of June.

Now that every part of the draft law is launched, Thune is looking to obtain the bill on the ground by the middle of next week. However, he still has to collect different factions within the Republican Senate to reach the draft law.

“It is a continuous work,” Thun said. “It, as you know, sometimes it is a kind of additional child’s steps.”

A group of financial falcons, led by Senator Ron Johnson, R and-OS, is not satisfied with the level of spending discounts in the draft law. Some Senate Republicans want to achieve at least $ 2 trillion in spending discounts over the next decade, but Johnson remained firm in his belief that the draft law should deepen and return to the levels of spending on the epidemic 19 years ago.

Others, including Sens. Susan Collins, R-Maine, Josh Hawley, R-Mo, and Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, feel upset with modicaid modifications, and the impact of these changes on rural hospitals and people working in the healthcare program coils.

“It is just a puzzle”: Senate Republicans are making a warning about medical aid changes and spending in Trump Megabel

The majority leader of the Senate John Thun indicates that the changes are likely to be on the copy of the House of Representatives from the “Grand and Beautiful Bill” of President Trump. (Getty Images)

Thun must strike an unstable budget law to balance his conference fears, given that he can only lose three votes. It is a fact that he admitted and described as trying to find the “sweet spot” as it can boost the bill to the home.

He was meeting with the factions individually, communicating with the White House and working to “make sure everyone rolled in the same direction.”

“Everyone has different views on how to do this, but in the end, it combines 51 votes necessary, so we are working with anyone who makes comments,” he said.

Collins and others work on the side to create a service provider relief box that can provide an ointment for continuous issues about the campaign on the MEDICAID price supplier tax on the bill.

The Senate Finance Committee went further than freezing the House of Representatives from the provider tax rate, or the amount paid by the governmental governmental programs to health care providers on behalf of the beneficiaries from Medicaid, for cases of expansion of the non -application care law, and included a ruling that reduces the rate in the United States annually until it reaches 3.5 %.

“We will do our best to make sure that rural hospitals, for example, have some additional help to the type of this transition,” said Thun.

The Blue State Republics threaten the rebellion against Trump’s “major bill” for Trump if the Senate changes the main tax base

A modified version of the Trump budget that was nominated in the House of Representatives was voted at the end of the Senate Marathon vote. (Reuters)

Thun, a member of the Finance Committee, pointed out that “we all agree that the provider’s tax has been developed” and “abuse” by blue states such as New York and California, and they have argued that the changes were made to help “correct the ship” in the program.

“I think this is the reason for this type of non -slope approach, and soft landing [from] He said, “The Finance Committee is logical, but these are fundamental changes, but on the other hand, if we do not start making some things to reform and enhance these programs, these programs will not exist forever, because we will not be able to afford their costs.”

The Senate producer will not be the end of the reconciliation process. Changes in the draft law should be lit in green by the House of Representatives, and one change in particular in the roof of local tax deduction (SALT) has already has a group of Republicans in the angry Blue State Council and the threat of killing the draft law.

The Senate Bill left, at the present time, the maximum has not changed with $ 10,000 of the policy reached by Trump’s first tax cuts, a number that Republicans in the Senate as a vice -holder while the negotiations continue.

In fact, Senator Marcin Molin, R-OKla works. , With members of Salt Caucus in the House of Representatives to find a compromise on the cover. But appetite to maintain the maximum advanced home at $ 40,000 is not strong in the Senate.

He said, “The passion for the Senate is strong, as is the case in the House of Representatives against changing the current policy and law in a way … The high -tax countries prefer at the expense of the low tax states and their faults.” “Thus, the emotion that you see on the side of the House of Representatives in this particular issue is identical to the Senate in a different direction.”

Meanwhile, as negotiations behind the scenes continued ways to address issues between Republicans in the Senate, parliamentarians in the Senate are currently roaming each section of the “big and beautiful bill”.

parliament’s role is to determine whether the policies in each section of the draft law are with the BYRD base, a group of mysterious parameters that govern the budget settlement process.

Thun made it clear that he would not reduce this parliament on Megabelle to Trump, and this situation was re -presented again. The reconciliation process provides any of the party in power. The opportunity to transfer legislation on the party lines and coordinate the Senate in the Senate, but it must adhere to the requirements of the BYRD base that deals with politics with spending and revenues.

Click here to get the Fox News app

However, Republicans in the Senate intend to take a page from the Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y, when Democrats shocked the agenda of former President Joe Biden through Congress.

“Democrats with [Inflation Reduction Act] and [American Rescue Plan Act]For this issue, they greatly sought the scope of reconciliation and what is qualified to look. “

“Therefore, we used this template, and we press the most we can to make sure that it allows us to complete our agenda, or at least the largest possible amount of our agenda, and fit the parameters of what is allowed,” continued.