US judge in Texas blocks Trump deportations under Alien Enemies Act

Two federal judges in Texas and New York on Wednesday, temporarily banned Trump administrationThe use of the law of foreign enemies to deport Venezuelan citizens-which is the latest in a high-level legal epic that focuses on the administration’s use of the Immigration Law in wartime to deport some immigrants immediately.

Prosecutors filed two separate lawsuits asking federal judges in Brunsville, Texas, Orange County, New York, granting a temporary restriction that prevents removal operations under the War Migration Law in 1798, which was reviewed by the Supreme Court only a few days ago.

The American boycott judge, Fernando Rodriguez Junior, in Bronzville, has given temporary temporary matter presented on behalf of three Venezuelan citizens. It is temporarily prohibited to remove it according to AEA, as well as remove “any other person who claims to be the respondents is subject to removal under the advertisement” from the Valley detention center in the province, according to the text of his ruling.

Rodriguez, one of the appointed Trump, stood up to the prosecutors that allowing the law to deport them is likely to cause “an immediate injury and cannot be repaired by the individuals who have been removed,” may not be “unable to seek relief.”

Judge Boasberg is ready to contract the supervisor Trump in contempt, and he will download the names of officials of the Ministry of National Security: “Beautiful superficial”

In addition, he said that “the great possibility exists that the individual cannot be returned to the United States” if it is deported.

Rodriguez said he would hear from both parties in court again on Friday to consider whether he would continue to extend the emergency order for 14 days.

In the New York case submitted to the Manhattan Federal Court, the American boycott judge Alfin Hilstein – one of the appointed from Clinton – stood with two Venezuelan citizens whose lawyers demanded that they would not have time to search for relief in the ideal granted by the Supreme Court in the emergency ruling.

Venezuelan immigrants walk after reaching a trip after being deported from the United States in Caracas, Venezuela, on March 24. (Reuters/Leonardo Fernandez Veeloria)

Lawyers in the deposit said that both clients, “and others put them in their position”, are now “at risk of imminent removal” by the Trump administration without a suitable notice.

Helstein’s decision, unlike the ruling of the federal judge in Texas, has stopped dealing directly whether the law of foreign enemies is an appropriate legal basis for the deportation of the two people, although it temporarily prevents the law from using them to remove them.

The updates follow a resolution from the Supreme Court from 5 to 4 on Monday, which raised the restriction order to the minimum court, allowing the Trump administration to resume the use of the law of foreign enemies temporarily – albeit with a new protection of accountability for immigrants.

The judge prevents the supervisor Trump from shooting at federal test workers

President Donald Trump signs executive orders at the Oval Office. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images)

The Supreme Court said that individuals close to deportation should have the opportunity to challenge their removal, with enough time to do this in an American court.

However, the procedures must take place in the federal judicial states in which the detainees are detained – which raises fears between immigration advocates, who notice that it is often difficult to bring these cases individually and usually occurs in court areas where most migrants are detained.

Lawyers of the American Civil Liberties Union said in a file in the previous court, noting that the law of foreign enemies is “a military authority” whether you are a member of the gang or not, so the law of foreign enemies is not used under these circumstances, “noting that the law of foreign enemies is” a military authority. “

“It is not supposed to be used in the time of peace against a gang,” they said.

Click here to get the Fox News app

When giving the temporary restriction order, Rodriguez, appointed Trump, agreed to the prosecutor’s argument that “maintaining the current situation is required to bear the parties to develop a complete record in order to consider the advertisement.”

“Moreover, if the United States mistakenly remove an individual to another country based on the announcement, there is a high possibility that the individual cannot be returned to the United States,” he said.

Trump administration lawyers The court urged to evacuate the minimum court ruling, under the pretext of a Supreme Court that the minimum orders of the court “rejected” the migration agenda, including its ability to “protect the nation from foreign terrorist organizations and risk the effects of the questionable negotiations on sensitive foreign negotiations.”