Trump’s DOJ still says Google should be broken up

The US Department of Justice is still paying to dismantle Google, according to a revised proposal presented on Friday with the Federal Judge Amit Mihta. As in its suggestion last year, the Ministry of Justice says that Gooj must have to sell its web browser, Google Chrome, and maybe android, as a punishment for being a monopoly, as Judge Mihata found last year, New York Times.

In its new file, the Google Ministry of Justice calls “Economic Golies” says, “It has deprived users of the basic American value – the ability to choose in the market.” To deal with it, “Google must strip the Chrome browser … to provide an opportunity for a new competitor to run an important gateway to search the Internet.” The department also recommends that Google must change Android business practices to enable competition or request to sell the operating system. I have been suggested that the company is allowed to sell Android instead of making changes.

The cross shows were part of the proposal made by the Ministry of Justice last year. But whether this line will carry this line during the Trump era, which technology companies had faded with money and praise since his election, it was a mystery. The president retracted some technology regulations dating back to the Biden era about things like the safety of artificial intelligence and cryptocurrencies, but he also suggested that the organization’s threat could be useful for obtaining the results he wants.

The administration’s proposal reduces some aspects. The Ministry of Justice now supports allowing Google Pay Apple to services that have nothing to do with research. It also no longer invites Google to drop artificial intelligence investments – Times He writes that, instead, the Ministry of Justice requires the company to “notify federal officials and the state before following up with investments in artificial intelligence.”

Google has made its own suggestion that does not include the sale of Chrome, but instead it suggests the restrictions of the court for the types of deals it can make, such as preventing it from asking the phone manufacturer that also Google Play licenses to install other Google software, such as Google Search or Chrome. As noted before TimesA listening session is scheduled for the proposals for the month of April.