Pollution Industry Using AI to Make the Case for More Pollution

In 2025, people find all kinds of use of artificial intelligence. Do not look further than the world’s leading partners in pollution, which are offered by loud new technology, bold new possibilities for creating corporate propaganda.

Louis Anthony “Tony” Cox Junior is the mouthpiece in the petrochemical industry and former Trump consultant who is now working hard to develop a large linguistic program (LLM) to monitor “advertising” from epidemiological research, according to epidemiological research. Guardian.

Cox – who once claimed that there is no connection between air pollution and respiratory problems – has a long history of cooperation with models such as tobacco monopoly Philip Morris, USA, the American Chemistry Council, and the Truck and Motor Manufacturers Association. Cox’s relationship with the American Petroleum Institute, Guardian He notes, so comfortable that even allowed the petrochemical pressure group “liberating” his research.

Work began on LLM in 2023, after a “long experimental chat” with ChatGPT, where he argued about pollutants and asked him to generate Sonat around Abraham Lincoln and PM2.5, a type of toxic bodily material. The last inquiry, Guardian The most prominent points, the line led “No nose can hold you, because you are very fine.”

Not satisfied with the time it took to persuade the acceptable chat that PM2.5s does not cause lung cancer-a hobby horse free of his profession-Cox turned into his comrades in the petrochemical industry to display an application that can be trained in advance to avoid annoying facts. Or, as he said, to do “widespread critical thinking.”

This app, of course, will tell users what Cox and his friends want in industry. His painful rich record, including studies such as a report sponsored by the chemical industry on the supposed safety of PFOAS, will not form a LLM training.

Like washing green, the practice of companies of distorting something environmentally friendly, experts say that “artificial intelligence” of Cox is a mysterious form of collective propaganda in the market, and aims to move away from abnormal personalities such as the stigma of “petrochemical”.

“Instead of scientists carrying out this work, which develops their economic interests, the industry funds efforts to use external sources to a machine Guardian.

“The models of the language of artificial intelligence are not programmed, but they are built and training,” Fardi, “and when it can be in the hands of this industry and its financing, it can be dangerous because it will lead to the erosion of the confidence of the public and the understanding of this decisive science.”

Cox’s insistence on washing the health of artificial intelligence on behalf of the corporate masters is a double paradox, given the impact of artificial intelligence on the environment-especially through air pollution. Researchers have recently found links between the generators of coal -powered energy used to operate artificial intelligence centers in the United States and the sharp rise in early deaths of cancer and asthma.

So, or perhaps when the major business robot in Cox comes online, it may not make a big scene. Instead, you are likely to leak into a portion of the incoming flood of new artificial intelligence tools – and all the consequences that come with it.

More about pollution: According to what was reported, Elon Musk does something terrible to operate his artificial intelligence data center